3.0SMCJ58CA
3.0SMCJ58CA
Active
Description:  TVS SMC 58V 3000W BIDIR
Manufacturer:  Littelfuse Inc
Datasheet:   3.0SMCJ58CA Datasheet
History Price: $0.88
In Stock: 35600
3.0SMCJ58CA Specification
Specification
Part No
3.0SMCJ58CA
Category
Transient Voltage Suppressors (TVS) - TVS Diodes
Manufacturer
Littelfuse Inc
Series
3.0SMCJ
Packaging
Tape & Reel (TR),Cut Tape (CT),Digi-Reel?
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Type
Zener
Bidirectional Channels
-
Voltage - Reverse Standoff (Typ)
58V
Voltage - Breakdown (Min)
64.4V
Voltage - Clamping (Max) @ Ipp
93.6V
Current - Peak Pulse (10/1000µs)
32.1A
Power - Peak Pulse
3000W (3kW)
Power Line Protection
No
Applications
Telecom
Capacitance @ Frequency
-
Operating Temperature
-65℃ ~ 150℃ (TJ)
Grade
-
Qualification
-
Mounting Type
Surface Mount
Package / Case
DO-214AB, SMC
Supplier Device Package
DO-214AB (SMCJ)
Unidirectional Channels
1
3.0SMCJ58CA PDF Datasheet
3.0SMCJ58CA Related Parts
3.0C100CA-M3/H
3.0C100CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 100V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C100CA-M3/I
3.0C100CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 100V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C10CA-M3/H
3.0C10CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 10V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C10CA-M3/I
3.0C10CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 10V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C110CA-M3/H
3.0C110CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 110V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C110CA-M3/I
3.0C110CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 110V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C120CA-M3/H
3.0C120CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 120V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C120CA-M3/I
3.0C120CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 120V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C12CA-M3/H
3.0C12CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 12V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C12CA-M3/I
3.0C12CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 12V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C13CA-M3/H
3.0C13CA-M3/H
Vishay General Semiconductor
3KW, 13V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0C13CA-M3/I
3.0C13CA-M3/I
Vishay
3KW, 13V 5%,BIDIR,SMC TVS
3.0SMCJ58CA Compare Parts
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI90A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI9.0CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI9.0A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI85CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI85A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI8.5CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI8.5A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI8.0CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI8.0A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI78CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI78A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI75CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI75A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI70CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI70A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI7.5CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI7.5A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI7.0CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI7.0A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI64CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI64A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI60CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI60A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI6.5CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI6.5A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI6.0CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI6.0A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI58CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI58A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI54CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI54A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI51CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI51A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI5.0CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI5.0A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI48CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI48A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI45CA
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI45A
  • 3.0SMCJ58CA vs 3.0SMI43CA
  • Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 112 customer reviews from all over the world
    Alessandra Romano
    Italy
    5 stars
    2026-03-21 10:18
    STM32F405RGT6 original as described. Is my favorite seller, very fast shipping!
    Fernando
    Spain
    5 stars
    2026-03-20 19:29
    I have bought many times and as a general rule always well, I recommend this store
    Adrien Blanchard
    France
    5 stars
    2026-03-20 13:53
    It is microphones circuits given the symbols CDR. If you are DIY novice like me you can nothing to do. The next I will be I will not order this format anymore.
    Ella Charbonneau
    Canada
    5 stars
    2026-03-20 05:48
    Thank you for the 4017 IC's
    Livia de Boer
    Netherlands
    5 stars
    2026-03-20 04:51
    fast shipping, good quality.
    Julie Barnes
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-03-20 03:51
    the IC chips arrived ahead of estimated delivery date...all items were in good shape ..correct t amount..but they were not shipped in an antistatic bag which means there is a potential for them not to work cause of static shock