XCKU3P-2FFVD900I
XCKU3P-2FFVD900I
Active
Description:  IC FPGA 304 I/O 900FCBGA
Manufacturer:  Xilinx
History Price: $2,455.08000
In Stock: 6900
XCKU3P-2FFVD900I Specification
Specification
Part No
XCKU3P-2FFVD900I
Category
Embedded - FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Array)
Manufacturer
Xilinx
Series
Kintex UltraScale+
Packaging
Tray
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Programmable
Not Verified
Number of LABs/CLBs
20340
Number of Logic Elements/Cells
355950
Total RAM Bits
31641600
Number of I/O
304
Number of Gates
-
Voltage - Supply
0.825V ~ 0.876V
Mounting Type
Surface Mount
Operating Temperature
-40 ℃ ~ 100 ℃ (TJ)
Package / Case
900-BBGA, FCBGA
Supplier Device Package
900-FCBGA (31x31)
XCKU3P-2FFVD900I Related Parts
XCKU025-1FFVA1156C
XCKU025-1FFVA1156C
Xilinx
IC FPGA 312 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU025-1FFVA1156I
XCKU025-1FFVA1156I
Xilinx
IC FPGA 312 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU025-2FFVA1156E
XCKU025-2FFVA1156E
Xilinx
IC FPGA 312 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU035-1FBVA900C
XCKU035-1FBVA900C
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 900FCBGA
XCKU035-1FBVA900I
XCKU035-1FBVA900I
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 900FCBGA
XCKU035-1FFVA1156C
XCKU035-1FFVA1156C
Xilinx
IC FPGA 520 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU035-1FFVA1156I
XCKU035-1FFVA1156I
Xilinx
IC FPGA 520 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU035-1SFVA784C
XCKU035-1SFVA784C
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 784FCBGA
XCKU035-1SFVA784I
XCKU035-1SFVA784I
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 784FCBGA
XCKU035-2FBVA900E
XCKU035-2FBVA900E
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 900FCBGA
XCKU035-2FBVA900I
XCKU035-2FBVA900I
Xilinx
IC FPGA 468 I/O 900FCBGA
XCKU035-2FFVA1156E
XCKU035-2FFVA1156E
Xilinx
IC FPGA 520 I/O 1156FCBGA
XCKU3P-2FFVD900I Compare Parts
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-L2FFVD900E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-L2FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-L2FFVA676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-L1SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-L1FFVB676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-3SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-3FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2FFVD900I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2FFVD900E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2FFVB676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-2FFVA676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1FFVD900I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1FFVD900E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1FFVB676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU5P-1FFVA676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-L2SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-L2FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-L1SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-L1FFVD900I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-L1FFVB676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-3FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-3FFVA676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2FFVD900E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2FFVB676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2FFVB676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2FFVA676I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-2FFVA676E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-1SFVB784I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-1SFVB784E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-1FFVD900I
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-1FFVD900E
  • XCKU3P-2FFVD900I vs XCKU3P-1FFVB676I
  • Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 146 customer reviews from all over the world
    Thomas Schwarz
    Germany
    5 stars
    2026-05-08 00:41
    Good Goods, good price. Delivered quickly.
    Jacek Szymczak
    Poland
    5 stars
    2026-05-07 01:17
    FAST SMOOTHLY WITHOUT PROBLEMS
    _______________________________________________________________________________
    GOOD SELLER 100%. SHOPPING OK.
    Vinícius Pereira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-05-06 01:02
    Got everything right .. Thiago of Maceió-Al
    María José
    Spain
    5 stars
    2026-05-05 22:25
    Fast shipping
    According to description, I leave you pictures
    Gabriela María
    Spain
    5 stars
    2026-05-05 22:22
    Ok, all perfect, good material. Thanks
    Sanne de Ruiter
    Netherlands
    5 stars
    2026-05-05 17:21
    Appears to be OK, not tested yet.